Repetitive paired-pulse TMS increases motor cortex excitability and visuomotor skill acquisition in young and older adults.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over primary motor cortex (M1) recruits indirect (I) waves that can be modulated by repetitive paired-pulse TMS (rppTMS). The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of rppTMS on M1 excitability and visuomotor skill acquisition in young and older adults. A total of 37 healthy adults (22 young, 18-32 yr; 15 older, 60-79 yr) participated in a study that involved rppTMS at early (1.4 ms) and late (4.5 ms) interstimulus intervals (ISIs), followed by the performance of a visuomotor training task. M1 excitability was examined with motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) using posterior-anterior (PA) and anterior-posterior (AP) TMS current directions. We found that rppTMS increased M1 excitability in young and old adults, with the greatest effects for PA TMS at the late ISI (4.5 ms). Motor skill acquisition was improved by rppTMS at an early (1.4 ms) but not late (4.5 ms) ISI in young and older adults. An additional study using a non-I-wave interval (3.5 ms) also showed increased M1 excitability and visuomotor skill acquisition. These findings show that rppTMS at both I-wave and non-I-wave intervals can alter M1 excitability and improve visuomotor skill acquisition in young and older adults.

Modulation of I-Wave Generating Pathways With Repetitive Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalography Study.

OBJECTIVES: Repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) at indirect (I) wave intervals increases motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to primary motor cortex (M1). However, the effects of iTMS at early and late intervals on the plasticity of specific I-wave circuits remain unclear. This study therefore aimed to assess how the timing of iTMS influences intracortical excitability within early and late I-wave circuits. To investigate the cortical effects of iTMS more directly, changes due to the intervention were also assessed using combined TMS-electroencephalography (EEG). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen young adults (aged 24.6 ± 4.2 years) participated in four sessions in which iTMS targeting early (1.5-millisecond interval; iTMS1.5) or late (4.0-millisecond interval; iTMS4.0) I-waves was applied over M1. Neuroplasticity was assessed using both posterior-to-anterior (PA) and anterior-to-posterior (AP) stimulus directions to record MEPs and TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs) before and after iTMS. Short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) at interstimulus intervals of 1.5 and 4.0 milliseconds was also used to index I-wave activity. RESULTS: MEP amplitude was increased after iTMS (p < 0.01), and this was greater for PA responses (p < 0.01) but not different between iTMS intervals (p = 0.9). Irrespective of iTMS interval and coil current, SICF was facilitated after the intervention (p < 0.01). Although the N45 produced by AP stimulation was decreased by iTMS1.5 (p = 0.04), no other changes in TEP amplitude were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The timing of iTMS failed to influence which I-wave circuits were potentiated by the intervention. In contrast, decreases in the N45 suggest that the neuroplastic effects of iTMS may include disinhibition of intracortical inhibitory processes.

Motor cortex plasticity is greater in endurance-trained cyclists following acute exercise.

Previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has shown that plasticity within primary motor cortex (M1) is greater in people who undertake regular exercise, and a single session of aerobic exercise can increase M1 plasticity in untrained participants. This study aimed to examine the effect of an acute bout of exercise on M1 plasticity in endurance-trained (cyclists) and untrained individuals. Fourteen endurance-trained cyclists (mean ± SD; 23 ± 3.8 yr) and 14 untrained individuals (22 ± 1.8 yr) performed two experimental sessions. One session included an acute bout of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) exercise involving stationary cycling, whereas another session involved no-exercise (control). Following exercise (or control), I-wave periodicity repetitive TMS (iTMS) was used (1.5-ms interval, 180 pairs) to induce plasticity within M1. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by single and paired-pulse TMS over M1 were recorded from a hand muscle at baseline, after HIIT (or control) exercise and after iTMS. Corticospinal and intracortical excitability was not influenced by HIIT exercise in either group (all P > 0.05). There was an increase in MEP amplitude after iTMS, and this was greater after HIIT exercise (compared with control) for all subjects (P < 0.001). However, the magnitude of this response was larger in endurance cyclists compared with the untrained group (P = 0.049). These findings indicate that M1 plasticity induced by iTMS was greater in endurance-trained cyclists following HIIT. Prior history of exercise training is, therefore, an important consideration for understanding factors that contribute to exercise-induced plasticity.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We use a novel form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to show that motor cortex plasticity is increased after acute exercise and that this effect is bolstered in endurance-trained cyclists. These findings indicate that participation in regular endurance exercise (involving lower limb muscles) has widespread effects on cortical plasticity (assessed in unexercised upper limb muscles) following acute lower-limb cycling exercise. It also highlights that exercise history is an important factor in exercise-induced cortical plasticity.

Motor cortex plasticity and visuomotor skill learning in upper and lower limbs of endurance-trained cyclists.

PURPOSE: Studies with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) show that both acute and long-term exercise can influence TMS-induced plasticity within primary motor cortex (M1). However, it remains unclear how regular exercise influences skill training-induced M1 plasticity and motor skill acquisition. This study aimed to investigate whether skill training-induced plasticity and motor skill learning is modified in endurance-trained cyclists. METHODS: In 16 endurance-trained cyclists (24.4 yrs; 4 female) and 17 sedentary individuals (23.9 yrs; 4 female), TMS was applied in 2 separate sessions: one targeting a hand muscle not directly involved in habitual exercise and one targeting a leg muscle that was regularly trained. Single- and paired-pulse TMS was used to assess M1 and intracortical excitability in both groups before and after learning a sequential visuomotor isometric task performed with the upper (pinch task) and lower (ankle dorsiflexion) limb. RESULTS: Endurance-trained cyclists displayed greater movement times (slower movement) compared with the sedentary group for both upper and lower limbs (all P < 0.05), but there was no difference in visuomotor skill acquisition between groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, endurance-trained cyclists demonstrated a greater increase in M1 excitability and reduced modulation of intracortical facilitation in resting muscles of upper and lower limbs after visuomotor skill learning (all P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Under the present experimental conditions, these results indicate that a history of regular cycling exercise heightens skill training-induced M1 plasticity in upper and lower limb muscles, but it does not facilitate visuomotor skill acquisition.

Age-related changes in motor cortex plasticity assessed with non-invasive brain stimulation: an update and new perspectives.

It is commonly accepted that the brains capacity to change, known as plasticity, declines into old age. Recent studies have used a variety of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques to examine this age-related decline in plasticity in the primary motor cortex (M1), but the effects seem inconsistent and difficult to unravel. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on studies that have used different NIBS techniques to assess M1 plasticity with advancing age and offer some new perspective on NIBS strategies to boost plasticity in the ageing brain. We find that early studies show clear differences in M1 plasticity between young and older adults, but many recent studies with motor training show no decline in use-dependent M1 plasticity with age. For NIBS-induced plasticity in M1, some protocols show more convincing differences with advancing age than others. Therefore, our view from the NIBS literature is that it should not be automatically assumed that M1 plasticity declines with age. Instead, the effects of age are likely to depend on how M1 plasticity is measured, and the characteristics of the elderly population tested. We also suggest that NIBS performed concurrently with motor training is likely to be most effective at producing improvements in M1 plasticity and motor skill learning in older adults. Proposed NIBS techniques for future studies include combining multiple NIBS protocols in a co-stimulation approach, or NIBS strategies to modulate intracortical inhibitory mechanisms, in an effort to more effectively boost M1 plasticity and improve motor skill learning in older adults.

Modulation of Motor Cortex Plasticity by Repetitive Paired-Pulse TMS at Late I-Wave Intervals Is Influenced by Intracortical Excitability.

The late indirect (I)-waves recruited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over primary motor cortex (M1) can be modulated using I-wave periodicity repetitive TMS (iTMS). The purpose of this study was to determine if the response to iTMS is influenced by different interstimulus intervals (ISIs) targeting late I-waves, and whether these responses were associated with individual variations in intracortical excitability. Seventeen young (27.2 ± 6.4 years, 12 females) healthy adults received iTMS at late I-wave intervals (4.0, 4.5, and 5.0 ms) in three separate sessions. Changes due to each intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) using both posterior-anterior (PA) and anterior-posterior (AP) TMS current directions. Changes in MEP amplitude and SICF were influenced by iTMS ISI, with the greatest facilitation for ISIs at 4 and 5 ms with PA TMS, and 4 ms with AP TMS. Maximum SICF at baseline (irrespective of ISI) was associated with increased iTMS response, but only for PA stimulation. These results suggest that modifying iTMS parameters targeting late I-waves can influence M1 plasticity. They also suggest that maximum SICF may be a means by which responders to iTMS targeting the late I-waves could be identified.

TMS coil orientation and muscle activation influence lower limb intracortical excitability.

INTRODUCTION: Previous research with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) indicates that coil orientation (TMS current direction) and muscle activation state (rest or active) modify corticospinal and intracortical excitability of upper limb muscles. However, the extent to which these factors influence corticospinal and intracortical excitability of lower limb muscles is unknown. This study aimed to examine how variations in coil orientation and muscle activation affect corticospinal and intracortical excitability of tibialis anterior (TA), a lower leg muscle. METHODS: In 21 young (21.6 ± 3.3 years, 11 female) adults, TMS was administered to the motor cortical representation of TA in posterior-anterior (PA) and mediolateral (ML) orientations at rest and during muscle activation. Single-pulse TMS measures of motor evoked potential amplitude, in addition to resting and active motor thresholds, were used to index corticospinal excitability, whereas paired-pulse TMS measures of short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF), and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI), were used to assess excitability of intracortical circuits. RESULTS: For single-pulse TMS, motor thresholds and test TMS intensity were lower for ML stimulation (all P < 0.05). In a resting muscle, ML TMS produced greater SICI (P < 0.001) and less SICF (both P < 0.05) when compared with PA TMS. In contrast, ML TMS in an active muscle resulted in reduced SICI but increased SICF (both P ≤ 0.001) when compared with PA TMS. CONCLUSION: TMS coil orientation and muscle activation influence measurements of intracortical excitability recorded in the tibialis anterior, and are therefore important considerations in TMS studies of lower limb muscles.

Age-related changes in late synaptic inputs to corticospinal neurons and their functional significance: A paired-pulse TMS study.

BACKGROUND: Recent work suggests that the function of intracortical interneurons activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is modified in older adults, with the circuits generating short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) at longer intervals appearing to be particularly affected. OBJECTIVE: To use SICF to quantify age-related changes in the excitability and recruitment of late synaptic inputs to corticospinal neurons, and investigate if changes within these circuits contribute to altered motor performance in older adults. METHODS: SICF was recorded with 3 different conditioning intensities in 23 young (23.0 ±â€¯4.2 years) and 21 older (67.1 ±â€¯1.1 years) adults. These measures were performed with conventional (posterior-anterior, PA) and reverse (anterior-posterior, AP) current directions using interstimulus intervals targeting late synaptic inputs to corticospinal neurons (3.5-5.3 ms). RESULTS: Peak SICF recorded with a PA current (SICFPA) was reduced in older adults (P < 0.0001), and occurred at a longer latency (P < 0.05). Furthermore, there was reduced recruitment of SICFPA in older adults (P < 0.0001), but this did not interact with the age-related shift in SICFPA (P = 0.2). In addition, reduced performance on the Purdue pegboard was predicted by increased SICFPA (P < 0.04) occurring at longer latencies (P < 0.04) in old but not young adults. For SICF recorded with an AP current (SICFAP), facilitation was again reduced at longer latencies in older adults (P < 0.0001), but recruitment was not different between groups (P = 0.7) and was unrelated to motor function. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that there are age-related changes in late synaptic inputs to corticospinal neurons and that these changes influence fine motor performance.

Visuomotor task acquisition is reduced by priming paired associative stimulation in older adults.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation may represent an effective means for improving motor function in the elderly. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the effects of paired associative stimulation (PAS; a plasticity-inducing transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm) on acquisition of a novel visuomotor task in young and older adults. Fourteen young (20.4 ± 0.6 years) and 13 older (69.0 ± 1.6 years) adults participated in 3 experimental sessions during which training was preceded (primed) by PAS. Within each session, the interstimulus interval used for PAS was set at either the N20 latency plus 5 ms (PASLTP), the N20 latency minus 10 ms (PASLTD), or a constant 100 ms (PASControl). After training, the level of motor skill was not different between PAS conditions in young subjects (all p-values > 0.2), but was reduced by both PASLTP (p = 0.02) and PASLTD (p = 0.0001) in older subjects. Consequently, priming PAS was detrimental to skill acquisition in older adults, possibly suggesting a need for interventions that are optimized for use in elderly populations.